Brain and brawn in balance: Central processing speed and muscle torque development speed are independently associated with the ability to recover balance with feet-in-place.

BACKGROUND: Stepping thresholds, i.e. the maximum perturbation one can withstand without taking a step, predict falls in older people. This ability requires fast central processing of sensory information followed by rapid execution of adequate motor responses, both of which are affected by age. However, there is limited evidence on their combined effect on stepping thresholds. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are cognitive and motor speeds important for stepping thresholds and do they interact, allowing for compensation? METHODS: Two-hundred forty-two people (mean age: 80 years, standard deviation 4; 110 women) underwent a series of waist-pulls of increasing magnitude to assess stepping thresholds in anterior, posterior and mediolateral directions. Cognitive function was assessed as simple hand reaction time and trail making test performance, and muscle function was assessed as isometric peak and rate of torque development of dominant leg muscles. Principal component analysis reduced these variables to four factors: peak muscle strength, muscle torque development speed (motor speed), executive function and central processing speed (cognitive speed). These factors were used in univariable and multivariable regression models to determine their association with stepping thresholds. RESULTS: Faster central processing speed (beta:2.69; 95 %CI:1.49-3.88) and faster muscle torque development speed (beta:2.60, 95 %CI:0.63-4.57) were associated with higher stepping thresholds. These associations remained in a multivariable model. No interaction was found between cognitive and motor speed on stepping thresholds (p = 0.602). SIGNIFICANCE: Central processing speed and muscle torque development speed affect stepping thresholds independently from each other and may both be important age-related motor impairment targets for preventing falls in older people.

Protocol of a 12-week eHealth programme designed to reduce concerns about falling in community-living older people: Own Your Balance randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns about falling (CaF) are common in older people and have been associated with avoidance of activities of daily life. Exercise designed to prevent falls can reduce CaF, but the effects are usually short-lived. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can reduce CaF for longer but is not readily available in the community and unlikely to prevent falls. A multidomain intervention that combines CBT, motivational interviewing and exercise could be the long-term solution to treat CaF and reduce falls in older people with CaF. This paper describes the design of a randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of two different 12 week self-managed eHealth programmes to reduce CaF compared with an active control. METHODS: A total of 246 participants (82 per group) aged 65 and over, with substantial concerns about falls or balance will be recruited from the community. They will be randomised into: (1) myCompass-Own Your Balance (OYB) (online CBT programme) intervention or (2) myCompass-OYB plus StandingTall intervention (an eHealth balance exercise programme), both including motivational interviewing and online health education or (3) an active control group (online health education alone). The primary outcome is change in CaF over 12 months from baseline of both intervention groups compared with control. The secondary outcomes at 2, 6 and 12 months include balance confidence, physical activity, habitual daily activity, enjoyment of physical activity, social activity, exercise self-efficacy, rate of falls, falls health literacy, mood, psychological well-being, quality of life, exercise self-efficacy, programme adherence, healthcare use, user experience and attitudes towards the programme. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. The healthcare funder's perspective will be adopted for the economic evaluation if appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH12840). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, local and international conferences, community events and media releases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000440820.

Effects of a multicomponent physical activity programme, Mobility-Fit, compared with a standard care lower limb strengthening programme, to promote safe mobility among older adults in care facilities: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Upper limb and core strength training is essential for older adults to safely perform daily activities. However, existing exercise programmes mainly focus on lower limb strength and are not designed or delivered to suit people with different functional capacities. This study describes the design of a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial to examine the effects of a multicomponent physical activity (PA) programme, Mobility-Fit, on mobility and frailty in older adults living in care facilities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 160 older adults from 20 care facilities in Hong Kong will be recruited and randomised by care facilities (1:1) to an intervention or a control group. Participants in the intervention group will attend the Mobility-Fit programme, led by facility-based instructors, three times per week, 45 min per session, for 12 weeks, while the control group will participate in a standard care lower limb strengthening programme offered by the care facility. Participants will then be followed up for 9 months. Mobility-Fit comprises agility, postural coordination, balance and strength training, with suitable dosage based on participant's baseline physical and cognitive function. The primary outcomes encompass upper and lower limb strength, trunk stability, reaction time, mobility function and fall efficacy. Secondary outcomes comprise daily PA level and performance, frailty, cognitive function and quality of life. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and generalised estimating equation (GEE) will be used to examine changes in outcomes over time and between groups. Data will be analysed following the intention-to-treat principles. We will also evaluate programme implementation and health economics throughout the follow-up period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was acquired in November 2022 from the Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee in Hong Kong (CREC-2022-459). Informed consent will be obtained from participants. The results of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed articles, conference presentations and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300072709.

Association of Prospective Falls in Older People With Ubiquitous Step-Based Fall Risk Parameters Calculated From Ambulatory Inertial Signals: Secondary Data Analysis.

Background: In recent years, researchers have been advocating for the integration of ambulatory gait monitoring as a complementary approach to traditional fall risk assessments. However, current research relies on dedicated inertial sensors that are fixed on a specific body part. This limitation impacts the acceptance and adoption of such devices. Objective: Our study objective is twofold: (1) to propose a set of step-based fall risk parameters that can be obtained independently of the sensor placement by using a ubiquitous step detection method and (2) to evaluate their association with prospective falls. Methods: A reanalysis was conducted on the 1-week ambulatory inertial data from the StandingTall study, which was originally described by Delbaere et al. The data were from 301 community-dwelling older people and contained fall occurrences over a 12-month follow-up period. Using the ubiquitous and robust step detection method Smartstep, which is agnostic to sensor placement, a range of step-based fall risk parameters can be calculated based on walking bouts of 200 steps. These parameters are known to describe different dimensions of gait (ie, variability, complexity, intensity, and quantity). First, the correlation between parameters was studied. Then, the number of parameters was reduced through stepwise backward elimination. Finally, the association of parameters with prospective falls was assessed through a negative binomial regression model using the area under the curve metric. Results: The built model had an area under the curve of 0.69, which is comparable to models exclusively built on fixed sensor placement. A higher fall risk was noted with higher gait variability (coefficient of variance of stride time), intensity (cadence), and quantity (number of steps) and lower gait complexity (sample entropy and fractal exponent). Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of our method for comprehensive and accurate fall risk assessments, independent of sensor placement. This approach has promising implications for ambulatory gait monitoring and fall risk monitoring using consumer-grade devices.

Theoretical framework of concerns about falling in older people: the role of health literacy.

Adherence and participation can be improved in health programs for older people with concerns about falling. While health literacy empowers older people to have greater control over their health, little is known about the extent to which health literacy influences health behaviours associated with concerns about falling in older people. This study aimed to synthesise current findings on health literacy, concerns about falling and falls to propose a multicomponent theoretical model on health literacy and concerns about falling. The model was developed based on a review of the literature, existing frameworks and models on health literacy and concerns about falling. Existing evidence on the relationship between health literacy and concerns about falling in older people is limited. Evidence from other research areas, however, shows that health literacy is closely related to many of the determinants of concerns about falling. More research is needed to clarify the impact of health literacy on intervention adherence and decision-making processes of older people with concerns about falling. Our model offers a novel perspective on the role of health literacy in health behaviours associated with concerns about falling, suggesting new research directions and providing insights for clinicians to consider health literacy when managing older patients with concerns about falling.

Fall risk stratification of community-living older people. Commentary on the world guidelines for fall prevention and management.

The Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults has put forward a fall risk stratification tool for community-dwelling older adults. This tool takes the form of a flowchart and is based on expert opinion and evidence. It divides the population into three risk categories and recommends specific preventive interventions or treatments for each category. In this commentary, we share our insights on the design, validation, usability and potential impact of this fall risk stratification tool with the aim of guiding future research.

Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Background: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for lower gastrointestinal cancer at a major referral hospital in Sydney between July and November 2022 were included. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. Outcomes included measures of feasibility, reliability, and safety. Results: Of fifty-five patients identified, seventeen (30.9%) were not interested, one (1.8%) had no internet coverage, and thirty-seven (67.3%) consented and completed both 5STS tests. The mean (SD) time taken to complete the face-to-face and remote 5STS tests was 9.1 (2.4) and 9.5 (2.3) seconds, respectively. Remote collection by telehealth was feasible, with only two participants (5.4%) having connectivity issues at the start of the remote assessment, but not interfering with the tests. The remote 5STS test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.957), with limits of agreement within acceptable ranges and no significant systematic errors observed. No adverse events were observed within either test environment. Conclusions: Remote 5STS for the assessment of functional lower extremity strength in gastrointestinal cancer patients is feasible, reliable, and safe, and can be used in clinical and research settings.

Circumstances of Falls During Sit-to-Stand Transfers in Older People: A Cohort Study of Video-Captured Falls in Long-Term Care.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the circumstances of falls during sit-to-stand transfers in long-term care (LTC), including the frequency, direction, stepping and grasping responses, and injury risk, based on video analysis of real-life falls. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: LTC. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed video footage of 306 real-life falls by 183 LTC residents that occurred during sit-to-stand transfers, collected from 2007 to 2020. The mean age was 83.7 years (SD=9.0 years), and 93 were female (50.8%). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used Generalized Estimating Equations to test for differences in the odds that a resident would fall at least once during the rising vs stabilization phases of sit-to-stand and to test the association between the phase of the transfer when the fall occurred (rising vs stabilization) and the following outcomes: (1) the initial fall direction; (2) the occurrence, number, and direction of stepping responses; (3) grasping of environmental supports; and (4) documented injury. RESULTS: Falls occurred twice as often in the rising phase than in the stabilization phase of the transfer (64.0% and 36.0%, respectively). Falls during rising were more often directed backward, while falls during stabilization were more likely to be sideways (odds ratio [OR]=1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07-3.55). Falls during rising were more often accompanied by grasping responses, while falls during stabilization were more likely to elicit stepping responses (grasping: OR=0.30; 95% CI=0.14-0.64; stepping: OR=8.29; 95% CI=4.54-15.11). Injuries were more likely for falls during the stabilization phase than the rising phase of the transfer (OR=1.73; 95% CI=1.04-2.87). CONCLUSION: Most falls during sit-to-stand transfers occurred from imbalance during the rising phase of the transfer. However, falls during the subsequent stabilization phase were more likely to cause injury.

Exploring Older Adults' Experiences of a Home-Based, Technology-Driven Balance Training Exercise Program Designed to Reduce Fall Risk: A Qualitative Research Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With an aging population, falls have become an increasing public health concern. While face-to-face exercise programs have demonstrated efficacy in reducing falls, their effectiveness is hampered by low participation and adherence. Digital technologies are a novel and potentially effective method for delivering tailored fall prevention exercise programs to older adults. In addition, they may increase the reach, uptake, and sustainability of fall prevention programs. Therefore, understanding older adults' experiences of using technology-driven methods is essential. This study explored the user experience of StandingTall , a home-based fall prevention program delivered through a tablet computer. METHODS: Fifty participants were recruited using purposive sampling, from a larger randomized controlled trial. Participants were selected to ensure maximum variability with respect to age, gender, experience with technology, and adherence to the program. Participants undertook a one-on-one structured interview. We followed an iterative approach to develop themes. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Eight themes were identified. These fall under 2 categories: user experience and program design. Participants found StandingTall enjoyable, and while its flexible delivery facilitated exercise, some participants found the technology challenging. Some participants expressed frustration with technological literacy, but most demonstrated an ability to overcome these challenges, and learn a new skill. Older adults who engaged in a technology-driven fall prevention program found it enjoyable, with the flexibility provided by the online delivery central to this experience. While the overall experience was positive, participants expressed mixed feelings about key design features. The embedded behavior change strategies were not considered motivating by most participants. Furthermore, some older adults associated the illustrated characters with gender-based stereotypes and negative views of aging, which can impact on motivation and preventive behavior. CONCLUSION: This study found digital technologies are an effective and enjoyable method for delivering a fall prevention program. This study highlights that older adults are interested in learning how to engage successfully with novel technologies.

A Self-Guided Online Cognitive Behavioural Therapy to Reduce Fear of Falling in Older People: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Traditional face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been successful at reducing fear of falling (FOF) in older people but can be labour-intensive and costly. Online CBT has been suggested as a cost-effective alternative but has not yet been tested in the context of FOF. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a readily available, self-guided and generalised online CBT program (myCompass) on reducing FOF in older people. METHODS: Fifty community-dwelling older people with FOF received a paper-based health education program, and half were randomly assigned to receive three selected modules from myCompass for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was feared consequences of falling at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes were concern about falling, balance confidence, activity avoidance, physical activity, exercise self-efficacy, health literacy and mental health at 6/26/52 weeks and falls incidence at 12 months. RESULTS: All intervention participants completed at least 2-out-of-3 myCompass modules. There was a significant main effect of time on feared consequences of falling (Cohen's f = 0.55). The group by time interactions for concern about falling (f = 0.28), stress (f = 0.26) and social support for health (health literacy) (f = 0.26) was also significant, favouring the control group. The overall attrition rate at 12 months was 24% (n = 12). CONCLUSION: The high program compliance and low attrition rate suggest that online CBT is feasible among older people. However, the myCompass program had no effect at reducing FOF in older people. A more targeted CBT program with a well-integrated psychoeducation module on FOF might be the solution to boost the therapeutic effects of a generalised CBT program at reducing FOF for older people.

Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.

Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through targeted educational activities. Unfortunately, none was available, thus we devised our own. Here, we report development of the Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA), and its application to publications from our institute's scientists. Following consensus meetings and external review by statistical and methodological experts, 11 items were selected for the final version of the QuOCCA: research transparency (items 1-3), research design and analysis (items 4-6) and research reporting practices (items 7-11). Five pairs of raters assessed all 231 articles published in 2017 and 221 in 2018 by researchers at our institute. Overall, the results were similar between years and revealed limited engagement with several recommended practices highlighted in the QuOCCA. These results will be useful to guide educational initiatives and their effectiveness. The QuOCCA is brief and focuses on broadly applicable and relevant concepts to open, high-quality, reproducible and well-reported science. Thus, the QuOCCA could be used by other biomedical institutions and individual researchers to evaluate research publications, assess changes in research practice over time and guide the discussion about high-quality, open science. Given its generic nature, the QuOCCA may also be useful in other research disciplines.

Economic evaluation of the e-Health StandingTall balance exercise programme for fall prevention in people aged 70 years and over.

BACKGROUND: globally, falls and fall-related injuries are the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality in older people. In our ageing society healthcare costs are increasing, therefore programmes that reduce falls and are considered value for money are needed. OBJECTIVE: to complete an economic evaluation of an e-Health balance exercise programme that reduced falls and injurious falls in community-dwelling older people compared to usual care from a health and community-care funder perspective. DESIGN: a within-trial economic evaluation of an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. SETTING: StandingTall was delivered via tablet-computer at home to older community-dwelling people in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: five hundred and three individuals aged 70+ years who were independent in activities of daily living, without cognitive impairment, progressive neurological disease or any other unstable or acute medical condition precluding exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: cost-effectiveness was measured as the incremental cost per fall and per injurious fall prevented. Cost-utility was measured as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. MAIN RESULTS: the total average cost per patient for programme delivery and care resource cost was $8,321 (standard deviation [SD] 18,958) for intervention participants and $6,829 (SD 15,019) for control participants. The incremental cost per fall prevented was $4,785 and per injurious fall prevented was $6,585. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $58,039 (EQ5D-5L) and $110,698 (AQoL-6D). CONCLUSION: this evaluation found that StandingTall has the potential to be cost-effective in specific subpopulations of older people, but not necessarily the whole older population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000138583.

Effects of the Mobility-Fit Physical Activity Program on Strength and Mobility in Older Adults in Assisted Living: A Feasibility Study.

Physical activity programs focusing on fall prevention often overlook upper-limb strength, which is important for transferring, balance recovery, and arresting a fall. We developed and evaluated a physical activity program, Mobility-Fit for older adults in Assisted Living (AL) that includes upper-limb strengthening, agility, coordination, and balance exercises. Thirty participants (85 ± 6 years) were recruited from two AL facilities; 15 were assigned to Mobility-Fit (three times/week, 45 min/session for 12 weeks) and 15 maintained usual care. Twenty-two participants (11 in each group) completed the study. We compared outcome changes between groups and interviewed participants and staff to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of the program. Among participants who attended Mobility-Fit, knee extension strength increased by 6%, reaction time decreased by 16%, and five-time sit-to-stand duration decreased by 15%. Conversely, participants in the usual care group had a 6% decrease in handgrip strength. Changes of these outcomes were significantly different between two groups (p < 0.05). Participants enjoyed the program and staff suggested some changes to improve attendance. Our results indicate that Mobility-Fit is feasible to deliver and beneficial for older adults in AL and may guide future clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of upper limb strengthening on safe mobility of older adults in care facilities.

Development and initial validation of the falls health literacy scale.

OBJECTIVES: (i) To develop the Falls Health Literacy Scale (FHLS), a health literacy tool specific to falls, (ii) to evaluate the FHLS's construct validity towards differentiating individuals with different fall-related health literacy, and (iii) to determine its reliability, construct validity and structure in an older population. METHODS: The initial FHLS, developed based on Sørensen et al.'s health literacy model, was first administered to 144 participants aged ≥18 years for feedback and scale improvement and preliminary analysis to determine the FHLS's construct validity in identifying individuals with different fall-related health literacy. After scale refinement, the FHLS was validated in 227 community-living people aged ≥65 years. RESULTS: Adult participants with more fall prevention knowledge scored higher on the initial FHLS than those with less fall prevention knowledge (p≤0.001). The final FHLS includes a 25-item subjective and a 14-item objective scale. Older people with ≥1 fall in the past year reported lower FHLS-subjective scores than those who had no falls (Cohen's [d]=0.29, confidence interval [CI]:0.03-0.56, p=0.03). Older people with lower levels of education had lower FHLS-objective scores than their more educated counterparts (d=0.51, CI:0.38-1.43, p≤0.001). Factor analysis of the FHLS-subjective generated six subscales, with CFA showing adequate model fit (RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.883 and χ2/df =2.35). FHLS-subjective (25-item) showed good reliability, with Cronbach's alpha=0.93, mean inter-item correlation=0.34 (range -0.03-0.81) and intra-class coefficient =0.86 (95% CI:0.69-0.93). CONCLUSION: The novel, context-specific FHLS displayed good construct validity and reliability. The FHLS holds promise as a screening tool to differentiate individuals with different degrees of fall-related health literacy, which may help guide fall prevention interventions.

Short Daily-Life Walking Bouts and Poor Self-Reported Health Predict the Onset of Depression in Community-Dwelling Older People: A 2-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether the amount and quality of daily-life walking obtained using wearable technology can predict depression onset over a 2-year period, independently of self-reported health status. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three-hundred twenty-two community-dwelling older people recruited in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Participants were assessed at baseline on (1) depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9; (2) average weekly physical activity levels over the past month using the Incidental and Planned Activity Questionnaire, (3) clinical mobility tests (ie, short physical performance battery, timed up-and-go test, 6-m walk test); and (4) amount and quality of daily-life walking assessed with a trunk accelerometer (MoveMonitor, McRoberts) for 1 week. Participants were followed up for onset of depressive symptoms for 2 years at 6-monthly intervals. RESULTS: Daily-life walking (ie, gait intensity in the mediolateral axis, daily step counts, duration of longest walk) and self-rated health predicted the new onset of depressive symptoms at 2 years in univariable logistic regression models. In multivariable models containing a self-rated health measure, clinical mobility tests were not predictive of the onset of depressive symptoms. In contrast, a measure of daily-life walking (duration of longest walking bout) was identified as a significant predictor of depressive symptom onset [standardized odds ratio (SOR) 2.44, 95% CI 1.62-3.76] independent of self-rated health (SOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16-1.96), with these 2 measures achieving a satisfactory prediction accuracy (area under the curve = 0.67, sensitivity: 0.78, specificity: 0.52). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A risk algorithm based on daily-life walking bouts and self-reported health demonstrated good accuracy for the prediction of depression onset in older people over 2 years. Wearable sensor data compared favorably with clinical mobility screens and may add important independent information for screening for depression among older people.

The Relationship Between Concerns About Falling and Daily Life Activity in Older Men and Women.

Concerns about falling (CAF) affect daily life activities in older people; however, it is unclear whether gender moderates this relationship. The authors investigated the cross-sectional relationship between CAF and objectively measured physical activity (PA) and gait quality in 503 community-dwelling older men and women. About 448 people (age = 76.2 [SD 7.9] years, 296 females) contributed sufficient data on movement intensity, activity duration (bouts of walking, sitting, and standing), number of transitions between activities (sit-to-stand and sit-to-walk), number of steps and gait quality, quantified as walking speed, and sample entropy. Associations with the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale were tested. The authors found no significant moderation by gender. However, women participated in less PA than men and showed a more irregular walking pattern. Higher levels of CAF led to lower PA and poorer gait quality. Our findings suggest that prevention of CAF-related PA avoidance may be particularly important for women, who are less active and at higher risk of falls.

Responsiveness of Daily Life Gait Quality Characteristics over One Year in Older Adults Who Experienced a Fall or Engaged in Balance Exercise.

Gait quality characteristics obtained from daily-life accelerometry are clinically relevant for fall risk in older adults but it is unknown whether these characteristics are responsive to changes in gait quality. We aimed to test whether accelerometry-based daily-life gait quality characteristics are reliable and responsive to changes over one year in older adults who experienced a fall or an exercise intervention. One-week trunk acceleration data were collected from 522 participants (65-97 years), at baseline and after one year. We calculated median values of walking speed, regularity (sample entropy), stability (logarithmic rate of divergence per stride), and a gait quality composite score, across all 10-s gait epochs derived from one-week gait episodes. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) were determined for 198 participants who did not fall nor participated in an exercise intervention during follow-up. For responsiveness to change, we determined the number of participants who fell (n = 209) or participated in an exercise intervention (n = 115) that showed a change beyond the LOA. ICCs for agreement between baseline and follow-up exceeded 0.70 for all gait quality characteristics except for vertical gait stability (ICC = 0.69, 95% CI [0.62, 0.75]) and walking speed (ICC = 0.68, 95% CI [0.62, 0.74]). Only walking speed, vertical and mediolateral gait stability changed significantly in the exercisers over one year but effect sizes were below 0.2. The characteristic associated with most fallers beyond the LOA was mediolateral sample entropy (4.8% of fallers). For the exercisers, this was gait stability in three directions and the gait quality composite score (2.6% of exercisers). The gait quality characteristics obtained by median values over one week of trunk accelerometry were not responsive to presumed changes in gait quality after a fall or an exercise intervention in older people. This is likely due to large (within subjects) differences in gait behaviour that participants show in daily life.

Protocol of a 12-month multifactorial eHealth programme targeting balance, dual-tasking and mood to prevent falls in older people: the StandingTall+ randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Falls have a multifactorial aetiology, which may limit the effectiveness of the common approach of exercise as the sole intervention strategy. Multifactorial interventions could be more effective in people at high risk of falling; however, the focus of such interventions has traditionally been quite narrow. This paper describes the design of a randomised controlled trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of an eHealth programme, which addresses cumulative effects of key fall-risk factors across the triad of physical, affective and cognitive functions on falls in older people. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 518 older people aged 65 years and over with high fall risk, defined as having a history of falls in the past 6 months, self-reported fear of falling or being aged 80 years or over, will be recruited via local advertisements, newsletters and presentations, and randomised to an intervention or health education control group. The intervention comprises balance exercise, cognitive-motor exercise and cognitive-behavioural therapy, with their dosage based on participant's baseline balance, executive function and mood. The primary outcome is the rate of falls in the 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months comprise programme adherence, healthcare use, physical activity, balance and mobility, cognitive function, psychological well-being, quality of life, health literacy and user experience and attitudes towards the programme. Data will be analysed following intention to treat to gauge real-world effectiveness. We will further determine complier averaged causal effects to correct for varying adherence and conduct economic analyses to gain insight into cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Human Research Ethics Committee in December 2017. Outcomes will be disseminated via peer-reviewed articles, conference presentations, community events and media releases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000540112.

E-health StandingTall balance exercise for fall prevention in older people: results of a two year randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether StandingTall, a home based, e-health balance exercise programme delivered through an app, could provide an effective, self-managed fall prevention programme for community dwelling older people. DESIGN: Assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Older people living independently in the community in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 503 people aged 70 years and older who were independent in activities of daily living, without cognitive impairment, progressive neurological disease, or any other unstable or acute medical condition precluding exercise. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were block randomised to an intervention group (two hours of StandingTall per week and health education; n=254) or a control group (health education; n=249) for two years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the rate of falls (number of falls per person year) and the proportion of people who had a fall over 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the number of people who had a fall and the number who had an injurious fall (resulting in any injury or requiring medical care), adherence, mood, health related quality of life, and activity levels over 24 months; and balance and mobility outcomes over 12 months. RESULTS: The fall rates were not statistically different in the two groups after the first 12 months (0.60 falls per year (standard deviation 1.05) in the intervention group; 0.76 (1.25) in the control group; incidence rate ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.13, P=0.071). Additionally, the proportion of people who fell was not statistically different at 12 months (34.6% in intervention group, 40.2% in control group; relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.20, P=0.461). However, the intervention group had a 16% lower rate of falls over 24 months compared with the control group (incidence rate ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.98, P=0.027). Both groups had a similar proportion of people who fell over 24 months (relative risk 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.10, P=0.239), but the proportion of people who had an injurious fall over 24 months was 20% lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (relative risk 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.98, P=0.031). In the intervention group, 68.1% and 52.0% of participants exercised for a median of 114.0 min/week (interquartile range 53.5) after 12 months and 120.4 min/week (38.6) after 24 months, respectively. Groups remained similar in mood and activity levels. The intervention group had a 0.03 (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.06) improvement on the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five dimension five level) utility score at six months, and an improvement in standing balance of 11 s (95% confidence interval 2 to 19 s) at six months and 10 s (1 to 19 s) at 12 months. No serious training related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The StandingTall balance exercise programme did not significantly affect the primary outcomes of this study. However, the programme significantly reduced the rate of falls and the number of injurious falls over two years, with similar but not statistically significant effects at 12 months. E-health exercise programmes could provide promising scalable fall prevention strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000138583.